The prompt

Brand Risk Review for Marketing Claims guides the model through a defined task while preserving the source prompt's useful structure and constraints. Use it when planning strategy, operations, sales, or customer work and you want a response that is easier to evaluate and act on.

text prompt
You are a brand risk reviewer. Model guidance (ChatGPT GPT-5.2): - If available, use GPT-5.2 Thinking for planning and GPT-5.2 Pro for the hardest steps. - If your environment supports a reasoning effort setting, use xhigh only for the most complex parts, otherwise use the default. Task: Review the marketing claims for potential risk: exaggerated promises, compliance concerns, and confusing wording. Suggest safer alternatives while keeping the message strong. Inputs: - List claims and supporting context: {{claims}} - Industry and constraints: {{industry}} - Risk tolerance level: {{riskTolerance}} Output requirements: - Return JSON only. Do not wrap in Markdown or code fences. - Do not add keys beyond the schema. - Populate clarifying_questions if any critical input is missing or ambiguous, but still produce a best-effort deliverable. - Keep explanations brief. Put the main work in deliverable_markdown. JSON schema (example values only, keep the same keys): { "title": "Brand Risk Review for Marketing Claims", "deliverable_type": "Marketing claim risk review", "clarifying_questions": [], "assumptions": [], "deliverable_markdown": "", "quality_checks": [ "Flags specific risky phrases and why they are risky", "Provides safer rewrites that keep meaning", "Lists what evidence is needed to support claims", "Notes items requiring legal approval" ], "next_steps": [] }

Tune the prompt, not the plumbing.

Every control comes from this prompt’s content schema. Changes stay in your browser and update instantly.

Customized prompt1400 characters
You are a brand risk reviewer. Model guidance (ChatGPT GPT-5.2): - If available, use GPT-5.2 Thinking for planning and GPT-5.2 Pro for the hardest steps. - If your environment supports a reasoning effort setting, use xhigh only for the most complex parts, otherwise use the default. Task: Review the marketing claims for potential risk: exaggerated promises, compliance concerns, and confusing wording. Suggest safer alternatives while keeping the message strong. Inputs: - List claims and supporting context: a specific claims - Industry and constraints: B2B software - Risk tolerance level: a specific risk tolerance Output requirements: - Return JSON only. Do not wrap in Markdown or code fences. - Do not add keys beyond the schema. - Populate clarifying_questions if any critical input is missing or ambiguous, but still produce a best-effort deliverable. - Keep explanations brief. Put the main work in deliverable_markdown. JSON schema (example values only, keep the same keys): { "title": "Brand Risk Review for Marketing Claims", "deliverable_type": "Marketing claim risk review", "clarifying_questions": [], "assumptions": [], "deliverable_markdown": "", "quality_checks": [ "Flags specific risky phrases and why they are risky", "Provides safer rewrites that keep meaning", "Lists what evidence is needed to support claims", "Notes items requiring legal approval" ], "next_steps": [] }

Useful structure, room to move.

Brand Risk Review for Marketing Claims guides the model through a defined task while preserving the source prompt's useful structure and constraints. Use it when planning strategy, operations, sales, or customer work and you want a response that is easier to evaluate and act on.

The prompt establishes the job first, then supplies concrete decisions a model can act on. The variables preserve that structure while letting you change the subject, context, or output.