Coding
Claude Artifacts Code Review with Risk Score
Claude Artifacts Code Review with Risk Score turns technical context into clear code, diagnosis, or implementation guidance with clear constraints and an explicit output.
The prompt
Claude Artifacts Code Review with Risk Score guides the model through a defined task while preserving the source prompt's useful structure and constraints. Use it when planning, writing, reviewing, or debugging software and you want a response that is easier to evaluate and act on.
text prompt
You are a staff engineer performing a production code review.
Context
- PR goal: {{prGoal}}
- Code diff or changed files: {{diffOrFiles}}
- Runtime context: {{runtimeContext}}
- Risk tolerance: {{riskTolerance}}
Hard requirements
1) Output as ONE Claude Artifact titled: "Code Review"
2) Create a table of findings with columns:
- Severity (blocker, high, medium, low)
- Area (correctness, security, performance, reliability, maintainability, UX)
- Finding
- Why it matters
- Suggested fix
- Confidence (high, medium, low)
3) Include:
- Top 5 prioritized changes
- Test plan
- Backwards compatibility notes
- Security review notes
4) If you propose code changes, provide them as unified diffs.
Constraints
- Be specific and refer to exact lines or functions as provided.
- Prefer actionable feedback over style opinions.
- Avoid generic advice.
Diff format for suggestions
File: path/to/file.ext
```diff
unified diff
```
Tune the prompt, not the plumbing.
Every control comes from this prompt’s content schema. Changes stay in your browser and update instantly.
Customized prompt983 characters
You are a staff engineer performing a production code review.
Context
- PR goal: a specific pr goal
- Code diff or changed files: a specific diff or files
- Runtime context: Paste the relevant source material and context here.
- Risk tolerance: a specific risk tolerance
Hard requirements
1) Output as ONE Claude Artifact titled: "Code Review"
2) Create a table of findings with columns:
- Severity (blocker, high, medium, low)
- Area (correctness, security, performance, reliability, maintainability, UX)
- Finding
- Why it matters
- Suggested fix
- Confidence (high, medium, low)
3) Include:
- Top 5 prioritized changes
- Test plan
- Backwards compatibility notes
- Security review notes
4) If you propose code changes, provide them as unified diffs.
Constraints
- Be specific and refer to exact lines or functions as provided.
- Prefer actionable feedback over style opinions.
- Avoid generic advice.
Diff format for suggestions
File: path/to/file.ext
```diff
unified diff
```
Useful structure, room to move.
Claude Artifacts Code Review with Risk Score guides the model through a defined task while preserving the source prompt's useful structure and constraints. Use it when planning, writing, reviewing, or debugging software and you want a response that is easier to evaluate and act on.
The prompt establishes the job first, then supplies concrete decisions a model can act on. The variables preserve that structure while letting you change the subject, context, or output.
Related prompts
License and Compliance Scan Remediation Plan
License and Compliance Scan Remediation Plan turns technical context into clear code, diagnosis, or implementation guidance with clear constraints and an explicit output.
ChatGPTClaudeGemini
API Architecture Audit
API Architecture Audit turns technical context into clear code, diagnosis, or implementation guidance with clear constraints and an explicit output.
ChatGPTClaudeGemini
API Endpoint Specification
API Endpoint Specification turns technical context into clear code, diagnosis, or implementation guidance with clear constraints and an explicit output.
ChatGPTClaudeGemini
API Rate Limit and Retry Best Practices Research
API Rate Limit and Retry Best Practices Research turns technical context into clear code, diagnosis, or implementation guidance with clear constraints and an explicit output.
ChatGPTClaudeGemini